Cameco Looking To Acquire Undervalued Uranium MinersJeb Handwergerupdated May 29, 2012TweetAt GET.com we maintain complete editorial integrity on our content & provide transparent & unbiased information. Companies don't pay us to include their products although we receive a compensation when you successfully apply to products from our partners. See how we make money here.At GET.com we maintain complete editorial integrity.Stealthily and without much publicity from the media, developments in the nuclear industry are moving ahead. While the Western nations are beset by their own economic problems they continue to dither about the very source of cheap, inexpensive industrial energy namely the uranium miners. We note with interest the recent ok by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission for the construction of two nuclear facilities in South Carolina at a cost of $11 billion. These plants are on top of the green-light given over two months ago to two plants in Georgia. All this is occurring after a lapse of over thirty years in such construction. The Western Press continues to be mesmerized by the daily featuring of the latest affairs of Pop Tarts and Hollywood Junkies. Meanwhile, Asian nations are tending to the business of providing safe inexpensive, latest generation nuclear reactors for their populations. Moreover, the aforementioned American nuclear plants are coming to us courtesy of the Japanese Unit of Westinghouse- Toshiba, using a whole new generation of the latest nuclear technologies. Over in such countries such as Vietnam, Malaysia, China and India amongst others are going full speed ahead in providing a safe, inexpensive source of energy for their developing nations. Interestingly, Cameco (CCJ) recently offered to purchase unused uranium from the shutdown of the Japanese antiquated nuclear reactors. Tokyo declined the offer. The Japanese Prime Minister is on record for reviving nuclear in Japan. Could it be that Japan has intentions of a nuclear renaissance using Toshiba to work at home constructing next generation reactors which are safer and economic? Industry has learned from the past mistakes. The specific failure at Fukushima was due to the loss of power, resulting in the failure to actively circulate cooling water. The new age reactors have the ability to provide the passive system of cool water that does not require electrically powered pumps. The new reactors are bidding farewell to outmoded forty year old designs to which the media choose to be completely oblivious. China waits off stage in need of uranium. Fukushima is not slowing down China’s nuclear appetite. A nuclear power industry was held April 6th in Shenzhen attracting over 300 companies all over the world. Homage was paid to Fukushima, but it did not deter these companies from continuing the development of nuclear energy. In fact at the opening ceremony the Chairman of the Chinese Nuclear Association stated, “The accident at Fukushima does not suggest any end to the nuclear renaissance. It may be a catalyst to continuing the safe development of the industry.” Among the over 300 companies attending were Areva, Hitachi and an assortment of mainland companies. Prime Minister Harper has returned from China with a deal that brings almost $3 billion dollars worth of energy deals which includes uranium from Cameco’s motherlode in the Athabasca Basin to satisfy China’s insatiable hunger for its domestic expansion into the construction of nuclear power plants. Recently, Denison Mines announced an important merger with Energy Fuels. The stated intention is to form the largest U.S. pure play uranium producer operating in a country that consumes 55 million pounds a year, but produces less than 4 million pounds of uranium. This represents an ongoing significant shortfall in the supply demand equation. Were it not for the Russian’s supplying uranium to the U.S. as part of the “Megatons to Megawatts” arrangement slated to end in 2013, we would be experiencing major power failures. This is only delaying the inevitable day when in 2013 the Russo-American agreement expires. This can only result in a growing world interest in the American nuclear mining industry. Enter center stage Uranerz Energy (URZ) who is strategically located in the Powder River Basin in Wyoming surrounded by the big boys, Uranium One and Cameco.Uranerz is making excellent progress with mine construction on the plant and well fields. Uranerz could be producing 6-800 thousand lbs by the end of the year.Uranerz’s ace up their sleeve is that their operations use in situ recovery methods that require lower capital costs and use more environmentally friendly methods. Unlike costlier conventional mines, Uranerz could produce uranium in the mid $30’s. The company could be the next major U.S. uranium producer at a time when new uranium supply is critical. The company has a strong treasury, a partnership with Cameco and off take agreements with some of the largest U.S. utilities, which indicates that Uranerz may be best of breed of near term U.S. producers. Check out my interview with Dennis Higgs, Executive Chairman of Uranerz earlier this year below. Cameco is raising a warchest of $1 billon to acquire junior uranium miners such as Uranerz who are trading at bargain basement discounts. Uranium miners are incredibly cheap due to the Fukushima Disaster and a weak resource market. Rio Tinto made its first acquisition since 2007 outbidding Cameco to buy Hathor for a premium. Could this be a signal that the big boys are just beginning to acquire high quality junior miners located in mining friendly jurisdictions? We believe major sovereign funds and miners will continue to make strategic investments in this beaten down sector. Cameco already had sufficient cash to operate and this raise may indicate that they are ready to make major moves. Cameco’s CEO Tim Gitzel recently said, We are making deals and we continue to scour the world and if we see something that fits for us, we’ll move very quickly.” Disclosure: Long URZ and DNNEditorial Disclosure: Any personal views and opinions expressed by the author in this article are the author's own and do not necessarily reflect the viewpoint of GET.com. The editorial content on this page is not provided by any of the companies mentioned, and has not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any of these entities. Opinions expressed here are author's alone, not those of the companies mentioned, and have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any of these entities.