US Government's Borrowing Policy Moves From Care-free To RecklessMike Youngupdated Oct 01, 2009TweetAt GET.com we maintain complete editorial integrity on our content & provide transparent & unbiased information. Companies don't pay us to include their products although we receive a compensation when you successfully apply to products from our partners. See how we make money here.At GET.com we maintain complete editorial integrity.The Federal Reserve has published its latest quarterly report on debt levels within the US economy. The report highlights the enormous impact the recession has made on borrowing patterns. Households are borrowing less, though this sector of the US economy is still the most indebted owing $13.7 trillion. Private financial businesses have also reduced debt levels. The growth rate of borrowing by non-financial businesses, government sponsored enterprises and local government has fallen below the long term average though not with the same prudence as households. Bucking the prudent trend is the federal government, as the chart below identifies.Graph Source: Federal Reserve & New York Times.The federal government has more than compensated for the fall in borrowing growth elsewhere. In fact it has driven national debt up by more than a third in just one year. Failed financial institutions have been a major beneficiary of spending. The auto sector and 1st time home buyers have also benefited. Higher social security payments and lower tax revenues created further upward momentum in government debt.It is positive news households, in particular, are rebuilding their balance sheets but the pace of growth in federal government borrowing is not only unsustainable, it's positively reckless.US Gross Domestic Product for Q2 Better than Previously ReportedThanks in no small part to the increased government spending, detailed previously, US Q2 GDP data has been revised for the better. The economy is now reported to have shrunk by only 0.7% in the 3 months to end of June 2009. Last month the US Commerce Department estimated a 1.0% contraction.Some three months after Q2 closed, commentators are now awaiting preliminary Q3 data and the consensus suggests a return to growth for the US economy is highly probable. What is less certain is the rate and sustainability of the recovery as ongoing economic data remains mixed and can still fall short of expectations as this week's news again proved.Manufacturing data from the Institute of Supply Management (Chicago) suggested output in September contracted with the index falling to 46.1 from 50.0 in the previous month whilst jobs data from ADP employer services estimated 254,000 private sector jobs were cut last month noticeably more than the 210,000 of losses analysts predicted.Consumer confidence data also disappointed. The Conference Board, an industry group, said its consumer confidence index dropped to 53.1 in September, relative to August's 54.5. Markets expected an improvement to 57.0. US consumers continued to be particularly despondent about the likelihood of securing new employment.On a more positive note house prices seem to have stabilised and have risen modestly for 3 consecutive months in most regions.The week's generally poor data encouraged equity investors to bank profits and reduce exposure to risky assets over the week but despite the stall in the recent bull market, US equity markets still closed the month and Q3 with the strongest quarterly performance in 11 years.One of the primary drivers of recent risk appetite has been the prediction that the Fed will keep interest rates at highly accommodative levels for some months yet and probably deep into 2010. The Atlanta Fed President, Dennis Lockhart, re-affirmed this consensus on Wednesday citing the need for more evidence of a sustainable economic recovery before rates could be tightened.Editorial Disclosure: Any personal views and opinions expressed by the author in this article are the author's own and do not necessarily reflect the viewpoint of GET.com. The editorial content on this page is not provided by any of the companies mentioned, and has not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any of these entities. Opinions expressed here are author's alone, not those of the companies mentioned, and have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any of these entities.